Why you should organize your work around purpose, not org charts ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­    ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  

View online

Hero - Updated
MAR 16, 2026
About the Book Sign Up More Insights

When teams flounder, leaders often chalk it up to a people problem.

 

“They just can’t get along.” “They’re not trying hard enough.” “They’re not good at their jobs.”

 

Once the problem gets framed as interpersonal, the response tends to follow that diagnosis. Leaders mediate. They coach. They try to smooth tensions over. 

 

But in modern organizations, team friction is rarely just interpersonal. More often, it emerges when people are unclear on their purpose, their responsibilities, and how decisions actually get made.

 

What looks like conflict between people is often a symptom of structural ambiguity. It’s a design problem.

 

When interpersonal efforts fail to alleviate the friction, leaders often reach for the most visible structural lever they have: reorganization. They shuffle people across teams, rewrite job descriptions, and redraw reporting lines. 

 

The instinct is understandable. But it often makes things worse. So they reorg again. 

 

The common trap that leaders fall into is thinking that if they just figure out who’s in which function, who reports to whom, and who has what title, all their problems will be solved. Sorting names on paper will sort out the IRL chaos. 

 

But our world has progressed beyond the need for stable hierarchies. Work moves too fast. We’re constantly tackling unexpected challenges and ambiguous circumstances. 

 

The org chart is always going to lag behind the messy reality of everyday work. 

 

So, if a stable hierarchy doesn’t solve the problem when teams are struggling, what does? 

 

Everyday clarity. ✨

 

The reason reorgs get a bad rap is because they offer a false form of clarity. One that can feel cold and clinical because it’s based in bureaucracy, not in the day-to-day work. 

 

When work is interdisciplinary - when value comes from team synergy and not individual job descriptions - solutions aren’t found in the org chart. They’re found in sticky practices that get us the everyday clarity we need to make work suck less in this moment. 

 

In the modern organization, clarity can be kind.

 

Once you’re clear on how the work is actually getting done, you waste less energy on internal politics, backchanneling, and guesswork. All that excess noise falls away, and your team can focus on the work itself. 

 

This type of kind, caring, everyday clarity comes from defining four things:

  1. Purpose
  2. Near-term priorities
  3. Roles
  4. Decision Rights 

August developed what we call a Team Charter - a working document created for the team, by the team - that helps you achieve the right kind of clarity. It makes the implicit explicit in the pursuit of organizing around the work, not the org chart.

 

(If you’re looking for tips on creating your own Team Charter, scroll down to the Safe To Try section of this email for how to get started.)

 

When you make things clear, assumptions don't remain hidden. Confusion gets addressed. Daily friction over what gets done, by who, and by when fizzles out. The choppy waters calm, and your team can move forward with speed, confidence, and agility.

 

And, hopefully, a whole lot of care and kindness. 🫂

 

Karina Mangu-Ward

Partner, August Public

IMAGE_ Book Ad (1)
FOOTNOTES

What we’re reading, watching + listening to

HBR’s Favorite Management Tips on Building Trust on Your Team 🤝

This tip round-up has something for every team looking to build trust that lasts, featuring insights from Amy Edmondson, Ranjay Gulati, Ron Friedman, and more. 

 

Read it →

AI in the Boardroom: Cut Costs or Build Bolder Missions 🚀

What do we actually do with AI? Our very own Karina Mangu-Ward joins former August Pal Usha Gubbala on her podcast to answer this question and explore the possibilities of how humans and AI can work together. 

 

Listen to it →

Revealing: The Underrated Power of Oversharing 💬

Professor Leslie John’s new book takes a research-grounded look at the benefits of vulnerability and offers a framework for wisely navigating moments when you’re unsure whether to speak up or stay silent.

 

Read it →

SAFE TO TRY

 

Quick tips to start changing how your team works

You’ve just read about the benefits of a Team Charter. So, how do you go about creating your own? 

 

What it is: An open, editable document that clarifies the focus, boundaries, and expectations of a working team. 

 

How to implement it: To kick off the drafting process, schedule a dedicated session where the team can focus on crafting the charter. Discuss and decide upon the following sections: 

  • Purpose - Outline a clear, durable, and inspiring reason for assembling the team 
  • Mission - Decide a specific outcome your team is trying to accomplish in the next 90 days
  • Roles - Define and assign roles based on who is best equipped to handle them, not job titles
  • Decision Rights - Identify who makes the final decision on what, even when others disagree

This is a living document. Revisit it every two weeks (or as often as necessary) to ensure it continues to reflect your team’s evolving understanding and needs. Turn to it when conflicts arise, decisions get stuck, or when you need guidance on how to move forward.

Let’s Link Up
Group 9 (1) CONNECT WITH KARINA
Group 9 (1) CONNECT WITH AUGUST
Group 9 FOLLOW AUGUST

What’s this newsletter about again?

This is a newsletter about teaming. Real teaming. The everyday, unglamorous, transformative kind that actually moves organizations and people forward in a world that never sits still. In it, you’ll find stories, insights, and practices about the beautiful mess of modern work. You’ll also get an exclusive look at Teams That Meet The Moment, coming May 2026.

 

I’m so glad you’re here.


If you haven’t already, why not sign up?

IMAGE_ Logo

August Public Inc., 115 Myrtle Ave, Brooklyn, NY 11201
Unsubscribe  |  Manage preferences